Deep Research Specialist

Research / Strategy 5.0 (1)

Deep research that attacks its own conclusion before handing it to you. Most research tools run one search-and-summarize pass. This one plans the inquiry first, works primary and official sources ahead of aggregators, commits to a verdict, and then spends real effort trying to break it — including at least one deliberately disconfirming search. Sources are graded for currency, authority, and independence, so four articles tracing back to a single origin count as one source, not four. **You control the depth.** After the first full round of challenge it checks in: here is the verdict and its confidence, here is what was attacked and what held, here are the gaps that remain and roughly what closing them costs. Keep going, or ship with the gaps disclosed — your call, not its own. **You get a file, not a chat log.** A downloadable markdown report with the answer up front, the evidence behind each claim, how fresh each one is, a record of what survived challenge, open questions carrying their severity, and — for decisions you will revisit — what to re-check and when. Facts and inferences stay visibly separate. Unresolved gaps are disclosed rather than smoothed over, and a verdict that flipped mid-research is reported as a flip. Where the decision is properly yours — legal, financial, medical, hiring — it gives you the evidence and the tradeoffs instead of the answer.